Influence of the mode of production and dominant paradigms in the field of research
PDF

Keywords

Mode of Production
Social Determinants of Health
Research Paradigms
Health Commodification
Health Equity

How to Cite

Paúl, A. N. de. (2026). Influence of the mode of production and dominant paradigms in the field of research. SAP Primary Care, 2, 118. https://doi.org/10.62486/pc2026118

Abstract

This essay analyzes the influence of the capitalist mode of production and dominant paradigms on scientific research, particularly in the health field. It explores the tension between idealism and materialism, emphasizing how social and economic needs shape research agendas. The predominance of biologicist approaches over social determinants of health is critically examined, raising ethical questions about the ownership of knowledge and its role in promoting collective well-being rather than serving market interests. Additionally, it contributes a Latin American perspective, highlighting collective health and critical epidemiology as alternatives to biomedical hegemony.
PDF

References

La revisión realizada permite reconocer que la investigación científica constituye un proceso histórico y social influenciado por las condiciones económicas, políticas y culturales de cada época. Lejos de desarrollarse en un espacio completamente neutral, la producción del conocimiento se encuentra condicionada por las prioridades establecidas por los sistemas de financiamiento, las instituciones académicas, las políticas públicas y las necesidades derivadas del modo de producción predominante. Esta influencia no elimina el rigor metodológico propio de la ciencia, pero sí contribuye a orientar las agendas de investigación hacia determinados problemas, enfoques y líneas de desarrollo.

En el campo de la salud, esta dinámica se manifiesta en la coexistencia de dos perspectivas que, aunque frecuentemente presentadas como opuestas, pueden considerarse complementarias. Por un lado, el paradigma biomédico ha permitido avances fundamentales en la comprensión de los mecanismos fisiopatológicos, el diagnóstico y el tratamiento de múltiples enfermedades. Por otro, los enfoques centrados en los determinantes sociales de la salud han demostrado que las condiciones de vida, el trabajo, la educación, el ambiente y la distribución de los recursos influyen de manera decisiva en el estado de salud de las poblaciones y en la persistencia de las desigualdades sanitarias.

Las contribuciones desarrolladas por la medicina social latinoamericana, la salud colectiva y la epidemiología crítica ofrecen herramientas conceptuales para ampliar la comprensión del proceso salud enfermedad, integrando dimensiones biológicas, sociales, económicas y políticas. Estas perspectivas no buscan reemplazar los avances de la biomedicina, sino complementarlos mediante un enfoque más integral que permita comprender la complejidad de los problemas sanitarios contemporáneos y fortalecer respuestas orientadas al bienestar colectivo.

En este contexto, resulta pertinente promover políticas científicas que favorezcan un equilibrio entre la investigación básica, la innovación tecnológica y el estudio de los factores sociales que condicionan la salud. Asimismo, fortalecer la cooperación entre universidades, organismos públicos, sistemas de salud y comunidades puede contribuir a desarrollar agendas de investigación más sensibles a las necesidades de la población y al uso equitativo del conocimiento científico.

Finalmente, comprender la relación entre el modo de producción, los paradigmas científicos y la investigación en salud constituye un ejercicio de reflexión crítica que favorece una visión más amplia del papel de la ciencia en la sociedad. Orientar la producción de conocimiento hacia principios de equidad, justicia social y beneficio colectivo representa un desafío permanente para investigadores, instituciones y responsables de las políticas públicas, especialmente en contextos marcados por profundas desigualdades sociales y sanitarias. La construcción de una ciencia socialmente comprometida requiere reconocer tanto el valor de la innovación biomédica como la importancia de abordar las causas estructurales que determinan la salud de las poblaciones, promoviendo un desarrollo científico que contribuya de manera efectiva al bienestar común.

Jones T, Drach-Zahavy A, Amorim-Lopes M, Willis E. Systems, economics, and neoliberal politics: Theories to understand missed nursing care. Nursing and Health Sciences 2020;22:586-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12700.

Rushforth A, Franssen T, de Rijcke S. Portfolios of Worth: Capitalizing on Basic and Clinical Problems in Biomedical Research Groups. Science Technology and Human Values 2019;44:209-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243918786431.

Thorpe H, Clark M. Gut Feminism, new materialisms and sportwomen’s embodied health: the case of RED-S in endurance athletes. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 2020;12:1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1631879.

Atkinson S. The toxic effects of subjective wellbeing and potential tonics. Social Science and Medicine 2021;288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113098.

Barr-Walker J, Sharifi C. Critical librarianship in health sciences libraries: An introduction. Journal of the Medical Library Association 2019;107:258-64. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2019.620.

Bibri SE, Allam Z. The Metaverse as a virtual form of data-driven smart cities: the ethics of the hyper-connectivity, datafication, algorithmization, and platformization of urban society. Computational Urban Science 2022;2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43762-022-00050-1.

Birch K. Reflexive expectations in innovation financing: An analysis of venture capital as a mode of valuation. Social Studies of Science 2023;53:29-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127221118372.

Blesh J, Hoey L, Jones AD, Friedmann H, Perfecto I. Development pathways toward “zero hunger”. World Development 2019;118:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.02.004.

Bond V, Ngwenya F, Murray E, Ngwenya N, Viljoen L, Gumede D, et al. Value and Limitations of Broad Brush Surveys Used in Community-Randomized Trials in Southern Africa. Qualitative Health Research 2019;29:700-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318809940.

Breilh J. The social determination of health and the transformation of rights and ethics1 : A meta-critical methodology for responsible and reparative science. Global Public Health 2023;18. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2023.2193830.

Brisbois BW, Spiegel JM, Harris L. Health, environment and colonial legacies: Situating the science of pesticides, bananas and bodies in Ecuador. Social Science and Medicine 2019;239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112529.

Collard SS, Scammell J, Tee S. Closing the gap on nurse retention: A scoping review of implications for undergraduate education. Nurse Education Today 2020;84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104253.

Cook J, Cuervo H. Agency, futurity and representation: Conceptualising hope in recent sociological work. Sociological Review 2019;67:1102-17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026119859177.

Davidoff F. Understanding contexts: How explanatory theories can help. Implementation Science 2019;14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-019-0872-8.

Devenot N, Conner T, Doyle R. Dark Side of the Shroom: Erasing Indigenous and Counterculture Wisdoms with Psychedelic Capitalism, and the Open Source Alternative. Anthropology of Consciousness 2022;33:476-505. https://doi.org/10.1111/anoc.12154.

Dosi G, Fanti L, Virgillito ME. Unequal societies in usual times, unjust societies in pandemic ones. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics 2020;47:371-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-020-00173-8.

Flore J. Ingestible sensors, data, and pharmaceuticals: Subjectivity in the era of digital mental health. New Media and Society 2021;23:2034-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820931024.

Gilbert JR, Stafford MBR, Sheinin DA, Pounders K. The dance between darkness and light: a systematic review of advertising’s role in consumer well-being (1980–2020). International Journal of Advertising 2021;40:491-528. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2020.1863048.

Harvey M. The political economy of health: Revisiting its marxian origins to address 21st-century health inequalities. American Journal of Public Health 2021;111:293-300. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305996.

Heard-Garris N, Boyd R, Kan K, Perez-Cardona L, Heard NJ, Johnson TJ. Structuring Poverty: How Racism Shapes Child Poverty and Child and Adolescent Health. Academic Pediatrics 2021;21:S108-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2021.05.026.

Hossain A, Niroula B, Duwal S, Ahmed S, Kibria MG. Maternal profiles and social determinants of severe acute malnutrition among children under-five years of age: A case-control study in Nepal. Heliyon 2020;6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03849.

Istepanian RSH. Mobile Health (m-Health) in Retrospect: The Known Unknowns. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022;19. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19073747.

Jakovljevic M, Matter-Walstra K, Sugahara T, Sharma T, Reshetnikov V, Merrick J, et al. Cost-effectiveness and resource allocation (CERA) 18 years of evolution: Maturity of adulthood and promise beyond tomorrow. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 2020;18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-020-00210-2.

James E, Lajous M, Reich MR. The Politics of Taxes for Health: An Analysis of the Passage of the Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax in Mexico. Health Systems and Reform 2020;6. https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2019.1669122.

Lacy-Nichols J, Williams O. “Part of the Solution”: Food Corporation Strategies for Regulatory Capture and Legitimacy. International Journal of Health Policy and Management 2021;10:845-56. https://doi.org/10.34172/ijhpm.2021.111.

Lindström M. The COVID-19 pandemic and the Swedish strategy: Epidemiology and postmodernism. SSM - Population Health 2020;11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100643.

Lynch J. The Political Economy of Health: Bringing Political Science In. Annual Review of Political Science 2023;26:389-410. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-103015.

Malli A, Monteith H, Hiscock EC, Smith EV, Fairman K, Galloway T, et al. Impacts of colonization on Indigenous food systems in Canada and the United States: a scoping review. BMC Public Health 2023;23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-16997-7.

McCartney G, Hearty W, Arnot J, Popham F, Cumbers A, McMaster R. Impact of political economy on population health: A systematic review of reviews. American Journal of Public Health 2019;109:E1-12. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305001.

Mok KH, Shen W, Gu F. The impact of geopolitics on international student mobility: The Chinese students’ perspective. Higher Education Quarterly 2024;78. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12509.

Moncrieff J. The Political Economy of the Mental Health System: A Marxist Analysis. Frontiers in Sociology 2022;6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.771875.

Oronje RN, Murunga VI, Zulu EM. Strengthening capacity to use research evidence in health sector policy-making: Experience from Kenya and Malawi. Health Research Policy and Systems 2019;17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0511-5.

Petteway RJ. On epidemiology as racial-capitalist (re)colonization and epistemic violence. Critical Public Health 2023;33:5-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2022.2107486.

Poole N, Donovan J, Erenstein O. Viewpoint: Agri-nutrition research: Revisiting the contribution of maize and wheat to human nutrition and health. Food Policy 2021;100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101976.

Power ER, Mee KJ. Housing: an infrastructure of care. Housing Studies 2020;35:484-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673037.2019.1612038.

Qato DM. Introduction: Public health and the promise of Palestine. Journal of Palestine Studies 2020;49:8-26. https://doi.org/10.1525/jps.2020.49.4.8.

Rhodes T, Lancaster K. Evidence-making interventions in health: A conceptual framing. Social Science and Medicine 2019;238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112488.

Rodgers YVDM, Coast E, Lattof SR, Poss C, Moore B. The macroeconomics of abortion: A scoping review and analysis of the costs and outcomes. PLoS ONE 2021;16. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250692.

Schrecker T. Globalization and health: political grand challenges. Review of International Political Economy 2020;27:26-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1607768.

Slater S, Baker P, Lawrence M. An analysis of the transformative potential of major food system report recommendations. Global Food Security 2022;32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2022.100610.

Stephanidis C, Salvendy G, Antona M, Chen JYC, Dong J, Duffy VG, et al. Seven HCI Grand Challenges. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 2019;35:1229-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1619259.

Sterling J, Jost JT, Hardin CD. Liberal and Conservative Representations of the Good Society: A (Social) Structural Topic Modeling Approach. SAGE Open 2019;9. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019846211.

Terzi A. Crafting an effective narrative on the green transition. Energy Policy 2020;147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111883.

Thoradeniya T, Jayasinghe S. COVID-19 and future pandemics: a global systems approach and relevance to SDGs. Globalization and Health 2021;17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-021-00711-6.

Thorpe H, Clark M, Brice J. Sportswomen as ‘biocultural creatures’: understanding embodied health experiences across sporting cultures. BioSocieties 2021;16. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-019-00176-2.

Tsakos G, Watt RG, Guarnizo-Herreño CC. Reflections on oral health inequalities: Theories, pathways and next steps for research priorities. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 2023;51:17-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12830.

Tshabangu T, Salawu A. Indigenous-language Media Research in Africa: Gains, Losses, Towards a New Research Agenda. African Journalism Studies 2022;43:1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743670.2021.1998787.

Vogt CC, Zipple MN, Sprockett DD, Miller CH, Hardy SX, Arthur MK, et al. Female behavior drives the formation of distinct social structures in C57BL/6J versus wild-derived outbred mice in field enclosures. BMC Biology 2024;22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-024-01809-0.

Wispelwey B, Osuagwu C, Mills D, Goronga T, Morse M. Towards a bidirectional decoloniality in academic global health: insights from settler colonialism and racial capitalism. The Lancet Global Health 2023;11:e1469-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X (23)00307-8.

Yang G, Xue Y, Ma Y. Social organization participation, government governance and the equalization of basic public services: Evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2019;16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162996.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Adrián Norberto de Paúl (Author)