Abstract
Introduction: Human breastfeeding is universally recommended for its benefits to infant health. In the city of Buenos Aires, 53% of infants under six months of age are not exclusively breastfed. The marketing of infant formula, through packaging, promotions, and persuasive messages, affects the continuation of breastfeeding. In Argentina, compliance with the International Code of Marketing of Breast Milk Substitutes is partial.
Objective: To describe the marketing strategies used to promote infant formula in pharmacies in the city of Buenos Aires and their relationship to the International Code of Marketing of Breast Milk Substitutes (ICMBS).
Methodology: This was an observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study with nonprobabilistic sampling. The study included chain and independent pharmacies that displayed infant formula on store shelves distributed across the 15 districts of the City of Buenos Aires (CABA). Variables related to in-store placement, promotions, signage, and compliance with the ICMF were assessed using a structured checklist. Data were reported using frequency distributions.
Results: A total of 30 pharmacies were included, one chain and one independent district. The majority (97.7%) offered starter formula (0–6 months) and follow-up formula 1 (6–12 months). The formulas were located most frequently in the side sections of the store (66.7%) and on eye-level shelves (40%), as well as near other breast milk substitutes (83.3%). Discount promotions were found in 76.7% (n=23) of the points of sale, with discounts using a card or app being the most common, in violation of Article 5 of the CICSLM.
Conclusions: Marketing practices in pharmacies can constitute barriers to breastfeeding, affecting the mother‒child relationship. The persistence of noncompliance with the International Code of Marketing of Breastmilk Substitutes () reinforces the need to strengthen regulatory frameworks, enforcement mechanisms, and social awareness initiatives
References
1. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Alimentación del lactante y del niño pequeño 2021. https://www.who.int/es/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infant-and-young-child-feeding.
2. Gentile A, Degiuseppe J, Juárez M, Lucion M, Conti R, Fabeiro M, et al. Lactancia y nutrición en la niñez y adolescencia en Argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Sociedad Argentina de Pediatría (SAP) y UNICEF; 2023.
3. Ministerio de Salud de la Nación Argentina. Situación de la lactancia en Argentina. Encuesta Nacional de Lactancia 2022. Buenos Aires: Dirección de Salud Perinatal y Niñez; 2023.
4. Kotler P. Marketing management. 11. ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2003.
5. Brandt K, Da Silva G. Marketing and child feeding. Jornal de Pediatria 2024;100:S57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jped.2023.09.013.
6. Alé M, Bonet A, Nessier M, Gómez P, Rovirosa A, Zapata M. Marketing digital de sucedáneos de leche materna en la Argentina. Buenos Aires, Argentina: UNICEF Argentina y CESNI (Centro de Estudios sobre Nutrición Infantil); 2023.
7. Jones A, Bhaumik S, Morelli G, Zhao J, Hendry M, Grummer-Strawn L, et al. Digital Marketing of Breast-Milk Substitutes: a Systematic Scoping Review. Curr Nutr Rep 2022;11:416–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13668-022-00414-3.
8. Rollins N, Piwoz E, Baker P, Kingston G, Mabaso KM, McCoy D, et al. Marketing of commercial milk formula: a system to capture parents, communities, science, and policy. The Lancet 2023;401:486–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01931-6.
9. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Código internacional de comercialización de sucedáneos de la leche materna. Ginebra: OMS; 1981.
10. Lutter CK, Hernández-Cordero S, Grummer-Strawn L, Lara-Mejía V, Lozada-Tequeanes AL. Violations of the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes: a multi-country analysis. BMC Public Health 2013;22:2336. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14503-z.
11. Resolución N°54/1997. Apruébase el Código Internacional de Comercialización de Sucedáneos de la Leche Materna de la OMS. Buenos Aires: 1997.
12. Instituto Nacional de Alimentos (INAL). Código Alimentario Argentino – Capítulo XVII: Alimentos para Dietas Especiales 2022.
13. Becker GE, Zambrano P, Ching C, Cashin J, Burns A, Policarpo E, et al. Global evidence of persistent violations of the International Code of Marketing of Breast‐milk Substitutes: A systematic scoping review. Maternal & Child Nutrition 2022;18:e13335. https://doi.org/10.1111/mcn.13335.
14. Rodrigues GPN, Oliveira MICD, Boccolini CS, Sally EDOF, Moraes JRD. Avaliação do impacto de intervenção educativa em farmácias com promoção comercial de produtos que competem com o aleitamento materno. Cad Saúde Pública 2021;37. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00129919.
15. Naumann S, Gutiérrez M, Coba Gómez C, Amoruso J. Cumplimiento del etiquetado de formulas para lactantes según el Código Internacional de Comercialización de Sucedáneos de la Leche Materna. Revista Argentina de Salud Pública 2023;15:118.
16. Colegio Oficial de Farmacéuticos y Bioquímicos de la Capital Federal. Se realizó la II Jornada de concientización sobre el uso racional de los medicamentos en la Legislatura 2025. https://www.cofybcf.org.ar/noticia_anterior.php?n=832#:~:text=Capital%20Federal%20es%20el%20distrito,como%20primer%20efector%20de%20salud (accessed May 22, 2025).
17. Gobierno de la Ciudad de Buenos Aires. Farmacias – Buenos Aires Data. Buenos Aires Data 2025. https://data.buenosaires.gob.ar/dataset/farmacias#:~:text=DESCARGAR (accessed May 22, 2025).
18. The jamovi project. Jamovi 2025.
19. De Oliveira MIC, Boccolini CS, Fonseca Sally EDO. Breastmilk Substitutes Marketing Violations and Associated Factors in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. J Hum Lact 2021;37:158–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334420978405.
20. Bertoldo LAA, Oliveira MIC de, Boccolini CS. Violations in the marketing of milks and complementary foods that compete with breastfeeding in Rio de Janeiro City, Brazil. Rev Paul Pediatr 2022;41:e2021228. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/2023/41/2021228.
21. Mangialavori V, Magnani A, Rivero L, Pesce A. Evaluación del cumplimiento del Código Internacional de Comercialización de Sucedáneos de la Leche Materna en establecimientos seleccionados del AMBA. ReDSaL - Revista de Salud Pública del Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Nacional de La Matanza 2022;1:2–15.
22. Hernández-Cordero S, Vilar-Compte M, Castañeda-Márquez AC, Rollins N, Kingston G, Pérez-Escamilla R. Exposure to marketing of breastmilk substitutes in Mexican women: Sources and scope. Int Breastfeed J 2022;17:16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13006-022-00455-y.
23. Kelsen H. Teoría pura del derecho. México D.F.: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas; 2006.
24. Monteiro FR, Buccini GDS, Venâncio SI, Da Costa THM. Influence of Maternity Leave on Exclusive Breastfeeding: Analysis from Two Surveys Conducted in the Federal District of Brazil. J Hum Lact 2019;35:362–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334418783715.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 María Julia Scarensi, Karen Uría, Ommi Acosta Sero (Author)